Mostrando postagens com marcador India. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador India. Mostrar todas as postagens

domingo, 18 de abril de 2021

Pandemia bate recorde com mais de 845 mil casos novos num dia

 Com novas variantes que tornaram a Índia o principal centro de transmissão, passando de 15 mil em 8 de março para mais de 264 mil casos novos no sábado e mais de 273.810 no domingo, a pandemia do coronavírus de 2019 bateu um novo recorde de contágios num dia no mundo: 845.123, em 15 de abril de 2021, superando os 843.939 de 8 de janeiro.

O total de casos confirmados no mundo está em 141.113.721, com 3.017.412 mortes. Mais de 120 milhões de doentes sobreviveram, cerca de 18 milhões apresentam casos suaves e 107.445 estão em estado grave. A taxa de mortalidade dos casos encerrados está em 2%.

Nos Estados Unidos, foram registrados mais 40.482 casos e 352 mortes neste domingo, com alta de 5% na média diária de contágios em sete dias e queda de 8% na média de mortes em duas semanas. Os EUA têm o maior número absoluto de casos confirmados (31.668.532) e de óbitos (567.217).

A taxa de diagnósticos positivos por testes na Índia mais do que dobrou em 12 dias, de 8% para 16,7%. O estado de Chhattisgarh tem impressionantes 30% de positividade. A Índia tem o segundo maior número de casos confirmados (15.057.767) e o quarto de mortes (178.793), menos da metade do Brasil.

O Brasil chegou a 13.941.828 casos confirmados e a 373.442 mortes por covid-19, com mais 1.553 mortes e 41.694 casos novos notificados neste domingo pelas secretarias estaduais da Saúde e compilados por um consórcio de empresas jornalísticas. A média diária de mortes nos últimos sete dias ficou em 2.878. Está acima de 2 mil há 33 dias.

Mais de 930 milhões de doses de vacinas foram aplicadas até agora no mundo, sendo 215,5 milhões nos EUA, onde 131,2 milhões receberam a primeira dose e 84,3 milhões (25,5% da população americana) estão plenamente vacinados, 192 milhões na China, 125 milhões na Índia, 105 milhões na União Europeia, 43,5 milhões no Reino Unido e 35,78 milhões no Brasil, onde 26,18 milhões tomaram a primeira dose e 9,6 milhões (4,5% da população brasileira) as duas doses necessárias à imunização.

sexta-feira, 15 de junho de 2012

Crisis frustrates Rio+20 expectations

Since we are in a deep economic crisis, most people are more concerned with jobs and economic growth. The environment comes a long way behind. So, one cannot expect much from the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20).

The preliminary negotiations should have ended today, but there is agreement on only 28 per cent of it. There is a divide between rich countries and developing nations.

Brazil and China want to create a US$ 30 billion-dollar-a-year fund to help the transition to a green economy. The UN estimates the cost in US$ 1.3 trillion. Talks will go on during the weekend and probably until the heads of state and government summit on June 20-22.

But Presidents Barack Obama and Hu Jintao are not coming, as well as the German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the British Prime Minister David Cameron. 

Brazil and the developing nations of the Group of 77 argue that what was established in Rio in 1992 cannot be turned back, particularly the idea of "shared but differentiated responsibilities". Canada wants this part to be removed.

The rich countries do not want to give more money to China and maybe even to Brazil arguing that these are no longer developing nations. China alleges they still have hundreds of millions of poor people in the country side, but they have also trillions of dollars in hard currency reserves. They are adult enough to help themselves.

At the same time, Brazil, China and India do not accept anything but voluntary targets. They want money without further commitments. This is not going to happen.

Another friction is on technology transfer. The developing nations believe the rich will not do it because they see it as competitive advantages, and want to sell their green tecnologies in the future. But China is now the main investor and main developer of wind and solar energy. They are fitghing with the US for leadership in this area (and many others). Why should they need extra money?

I do not see any international leadership coming from China and any other developing nation. They are looking for money and excuses, are interested in new technologies, but have not changed their developmentalist growth model.

Despite having vetoed that ugly (anti)Forest Code, President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil has a very backward mentality in relation to the environment. She promised to protect the Amazon rain forest with governor Blairo Maggi, the King of Soy, at her back. She wants to build the Belo Monte dam at any cost. Petrobras is cutting its expenses in alternative sources of energy, says today the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper. 

Brazil is not doing well, growth was 0,2 per cent at last quarter, at 0,8 por cent, behind the US and Japan. The contry needs public investment in infrastructure and education, for instance, we need alternative energies and a broadband network to build the infrastructure of a 21st century economy. What does the government do? Cuts taxes for the car industries and credit through state banks. Most of the new middle class families have large debts. Lula's economic model is done.

Dilma said that wind and solar energy will not do it. Of course, it is not enough. But can be enough for domestic consumption, for poor communities in the Amazon and the Northeast, where it makes no economic sense for a large company to extend the grid because the cost/tariff would be too expensive.

Brazil had one the dirtiest economic stimulous packages after the 2008 crisis. In Korea, 75% went to the so-called green economy. In China, 25%. In the US: 12%. In Brazil, only 6%. That was under Lula, but Dilma is not much different.

For Brazil and for Rio, the conference is good. I do not expect much from the leaders, maybe the commitment to set sustainable development targets in the near future, maybe a new methodology to calculate the gross domestic. Europe would like to change the UN Environment Program into an agency like the World Health Organisation (WHO), but developing nations do not want foreign noses smelling their waste.

Anyawy, it is good for people's consciousness. The mayor closed the Gramacho wasteland, one of that horrible places where scavengers dispute rests of rotten food with the vultures. On a rainy Sunday morning, people got together to colect garbage at Copacabana, Ipanema and Leblon.

It is hard to change lifestyles. Rio+20 does it. At least.